Wednesday, September 28, 2011

IN CASE YOU FORGOT TO TAKE A CONSUMER ACTION — NETFLIX

IN CASE YOU FORGOT TO TAKE AN ACTION, THIS ARTICLE WILL REMIND YOU!

Why Netflix's Reed Hastings Proves It's Better to Beg Forgiveness Than Ask
Posted on Thursday, September 22, 2011 6:40:50 PM GMT   |  REPRINT FROM VAULT.COM


The message in my inbox reads, "Dear Cathy, I messed up. I owe you an explanation."
It's not from a cheating boyfriend—it's from Reed Hastings, CEO of Netflix. And I have to say I agree with him. Netflix's big split may well be a mistake. But then, I realize, that's not what he's apologizing for.

Imagine yourself in a similar position, at your company: you have to ask your customer—or coworkers, or boss—to accept a new initiative that will 1) Cost more money, 2) Cause inconvenience, and 3) Generally shake things up. Whoever your audience is, they'll likely give you a resounding "no."
Hastings, in his email, only apologizes for one thing: not fully explaining the company's plans before rolling out the new pricing system.
But it's likely that exactly those actions will keep Netflix afloat in the coming months.
Surprised? Don't be. Hastings has human nature on his side. By forcing Netflix subscribers to either passively forgive him (by not unsubscribing) or actively rejecting the new plans (by going out of their way to cancel their memberships), Netflix (safely) assumes that we all take the path of least resistance. And we will. Social scientists have known this for 70 years--the famous "allow-forbid" study of 1941 showed that only 25% of those questioned answered yes to allowing "speeches against democracy"--but oddly, a 46% said no to forbidding them. The only difference?  Required action.
Most of us are hesitant to actively say "yes" to new things. Take that effect and double it for the business world, where bad decisions translate to loss of money. Triple for a corporate environment, where complex hierarchies mean people's jobs are in danger for other's choices. Simply put, asking people to approve your risky ideas doesn't work.
Asking them to actively deny you a chance to try? That does.
Take Hastings: he upped prices, giving customers a vague explanation and one month of notice for the change. Would we approve of this idea if Hastings had asked first? No! Will we cancel our subscriptions now that he's gone through with it? Well… that's a tough one. It puts the uncomfortable decision in the hands of subscribers. And being humans, they—we—let the new pricing deadline come and go without cancelling.
In truth, Netflix has lost subscribers—news headlines report "plummeting stocks" and mass exodus of customers. But the reality—as reported in the Wall Street Journal--is that only 4% of subscribers actually said "no" to Hastings. Compare that to an estimate of how many would have actively given him permission to do this in advance (oh, 99.99% perhaps?) and that number sounds downright miraculous.
The lesson: never ask for your "no" by begging permission. Instead, do the legwork: create the business model, design the logo, and then, like Hastings, apologize when you need to. The results may surprise you.  
--Cathryn Vandewater, Vault.com


Why follow such a poor example?
Cathryn,

This is the first time I've really, strongly disagreed with a Vault article. I have to wonder where you're getting the idea that no one's upset with Netflix, or that the Hastings model is an effective one. It's very good at pissing off the customer base and eroding that base's trust in you, so if that's the goal you're espousing, I guess you're right. But I don't know anyone who hasn't considered canceling their service, especially since the "apology," which just made things worse, not better. And I am one of the few who kept any part of the service at all. I realize that my social circle is not all-encompassing, but I can't ignore the percentages I see, which are awfully close to 100%, reinforcing the idea that I'm not an outlier in being furious with Netflix and thinking that the apology was even more insulting than the initial change. Netflix used to be one of the best-regarded, most highly-trusted companies in the US, and thus a rare bird indeed. Destroying that trust is not going to keep Netflix afloat, and compounding it by making the service difficult to use (and giving the DVD service an absolutely stupid name that no one can remember or even spell correctly is not going to do them any favors, either). It's been widely described as the worst marketing move since New Coke, and not without reason.

I think Hastings and Co. have been surprised, all right, but not in the way you presume. I feel like I'm watching an old friend who has decided to commit a long, drawn-out suicide, and it's painful. I want my old Netflix back, and when Amazon or someone else comes along and has learned from Netflix's mistakes, I'm sure I won't be the only one giving them the final heave-ho. Are you really sure you want to say that we should follow this model?



THANK YOU FOR......
REMINDING ME TO CANCEL MY SUSCRIPTION!
I DON'T BELIEVE IN CONSUMER ABUSE!





PRESENTED BY: Executive Leadership, LLC SPECIALIZING IN: Human Capital Transition and Executive Coaching - (908) 822-9655 WEBSITE: http://www.exec-leadershipLLC.com
If you are seeking an Executive Coach for yourself or your organization, consider contacting CB Bowman, MBA, CMC at Executive Leadership, LLC 908.509.1744 cb@exec-leadershipllc.com; http://www.exec-leadershipllc.com.
CB Bowman, ia a Certified Master Coach and president, CEO of Executive Leadership, LLC. She is also the Chairperson and Founder for the Association of Corporate Executive Coaches (http://www.acec-website.org).
Among mid to senior level professionals Executive leadership LLC is the go to company for individuals and companies seeking human capital repositioning, development and/or growth through coaching, counseling, and strategic advice.
With her Fortune 500 business background, laser like precision, and a take no prisoners approach she swiftly narrows in on the issue, and unlike others, she presents financially sound, creative and action oriented solutions with infinite possibilities