Thursday, July 7, 2011

What Exactly Is a ‘Coachable’ Entrepreneur?

What Exactly Is a ‘Coachable’ Entrepreneur?
By ADRIANA GARDELLA

Courtesy BlueTree Capital Group
Catherine Mott

Previously, Catherine Mott, an angel investor, stressed the importance of investing in “coachable” entrepreneurs who surround themselves with solid management teams. As chief executive and founder of BlueTree Allied Angels in Wexford, Pa., Ms. Mott says she knows one when she sees one. But during a recent conversation, I asked her to try to specify what she looks for when investing in start-ups. A condensed version of our conversation follows.

Q. How do you define coachable?

Ms. Mott: It’s very challenging to identify. I wish it were black and white, but it’s more of an intuitive gut feel. During our due diligence process, which includes five to six meetings with a start-up’s management team, we hope to see that the founder is the kind of person who takes advice because we know and understand there’s lots they won’t know. They’ll make mistakes. In effect, we’re giving them tuition money. But we want to mitigate how much of it they’ll lose.

Q. Can you tell me about a founder who failed to gain your confidence?

Ms. Mott: There was one who seemed somewhat coachable. But he had met with a very successful entrepreneur who told him to place an extremely high — and in our view unwarranted — value on his company. The founder assumed he should price his company similarly, just because this other guy did. I suggested that he talk to other people who might be able to offer different viewpoints, and he chose not to. I could see he wasn’t going to listen to, or take, advice. Another problem was that he had only one independent on his board. The rest were insiders. He’s still not funded.

Q. Why is a start-up’s management team so important?

Ms. Mott: When you first get into this business as an investor, there’s a tendency to fall in love with a technology. But it’s not the technology that makes the company. It’s the people. You can identify a need in the market and be an industry upsetter, but you’ve got to have the right people to execute. Founders need to make us comfortable that they’ve analyzed their strengths and weaknesses and know how to compensate for the latter.

Q. How can entrepreneurs show you they’ve done this analysis?

Ms. Mott: We want them to be able to say, “I know I’m an engineer. I know nothing about sales or marketing. I know we need someone to develop a marketing plan.” It scares the living dickens out of us when we’ve got all engineers in the room and they’ve made one the vice president of sales. It’s a human foible. We’re more comfortable with people like us. I was recently at an incubator, speaking with a founder who said he knew he was not C.E.O. material. I was thrilled.

Q. Why should a founder listen to an investor?

Ms. Mott: I can only speak for BlueTree, but we are not unreasonable. I don’t hire yes people. I promote people who challenge me. I’m not always right. But I’ve built a solid company and have some experience. I’ve invested in 24 companies and been through four exits. I’ve got a pretty good feel. The longer you do this, the more you can trust your gut.

PRESENTED BY: Executive Leadership, LLC SPECIALIZING IN: Career Transformation or Change and Executive Coaching or Development - (908) 822-9655 WEBSITE: http://www.exec-leadershipLLC.com

Teaching Women to Think Like Angels (INVESTORS)

Teaching Women to Think Like Angels (INVESTORS)
By ADRIANA GARDELLA

Natalia Oberti Noguera

The overwhelmingly male field of angel investing is about to become a bit more diverse. Ten women, including some business owners (TechCrunch has the full list), will soon learn the secrets of angel investing during the Pipeline Fund Fellowship’s inaugural six-month program for aspiring female angels. Beginning this month, the group, chosen from among 50 applicants, will attend monthly workshops on issues like due diligence and valuation, and will be paired with mentors who are seasoned male and female investors. The program, held in New York, will culminate with an investment by the group in a women-led, profit-making, socially conscious venture.

The Pipeline Fund Fellowship was founded by Natalia Oberti Noguera to address the lack of gender diversity in the world of venture capital, while also improving funding options for the types of businesses in which the fund will invest. “Our goal is to change the culture of the investment world,” she said. While other funds (such as Golden Seeds), and nonprofits (like Springboard Enterprises) promote investment in women-led companies, Ms. Oberti Noguera, 27, said her program differs because it offers education, mentoring, and practical experience combined. Additionally, it is relatively accessible financially, requiring each fellow to pay $1,000 for the program and commit to investing $5,000 toward a $50,000 investment in a start-up that meets the fund’s specifications.

Elizabeth Crowell, who owns Sterling Place, a gift shop in Brooklyn, is among the angels-in-training. After building her business for seven years, she said she is ready for a different role and is eager to leverage her experience to help female entrepreneurs. A competitive swimmer who has coached the sport, Ms. Crowell said investing draws on elements of coaching, which she always loved. “As an investor, you’re on the sidelines to support,” she said. “It will be nice to be able to come up with ideas and not have to execute them,” she added. Although Sterling Place is not seeking capital, Ms. Crowell said, “sizing up different businesses and strategizing growth opportunities for them, may spark ideas for my own.”

While Ms. Crowell, 40, focuses on the program, her husband and business partner will handle more day-to-day responsibilities at the store. The couple, who have two young children, often liken their business to a third child. Ms. Crowell, who believes she will continue to invest after the program ends, said she suspects the companies in which she becomes involved will not occupy “the same emotional space.” One thing she said she knows for sure: “I won’t be showing up at the businesses every day, dealing with leaking roofs, sanitation permits and overflowing toilets.”

Another fellow, Erica Frontiero, 33, is a senior vice president in capital markets for GE Capital. She said that, while she spends her workdays raising funds for large companies, she lacks the confidence to invest in the start-ups of friends and friends-of-friends who seek her guidance. “I’d like to understand how the businesses I work with on a daily basis got where they are,” she said.

Ms. Frontiero sees a lack of resources for female entrepreneurs who wonder, for example, what is the right percentage of company ownership to give up, or, what is the likelihood that an investor will ask for a certain percentage. Despite the large number of women who are starting businesses, she said, “we still aren’t really talking about finances and investing with each other.”

In the months to come, we will follow the fellows as they become angels and decide where to invest their pooled resources.

You can follow Adriana Gardella on Twitter.


PRESENTED BY: Executive Leadership, LLC SPECIALIZING IN: Career Transformation or Change and Executive Coaching or Development - (908) 822-9655 WEBSITE: http://www.exec-leadershipLLC.com

Monday, July 4, 2011

Important news about Google



Google's New Social Network Google+

Google also launched its latest and greatest social media attempt this week, the social network Google+. Google+ has much in common with Facebook. Both networks allow you to friend or follow people and share photos, videos, and comments. They each offer the feature of a wall, or stream of information about what your friends are doing. They even look pretty similar.

However, Google+ is different in how it allows you to manage your friends. It has introduced something called Circles. Each friend can belong to one or more circle, or group of friends. When you share information, you can select which individuals you want to share the content with on a case by case basis.

Google+ also allows you to "hang out" with friends through group video chat. You can share videos, chat, or talk to each other via video. You still have the ability to only share your hangout session with the circles indicate you'd like to.

Google has also integrated Google+ throughout all of Google's other properties through a menu bar that now appears at the top of your browser window. It keeps you updated on what's happening in Google+, whether you are in your email account or keeping up with your blogs in your reader.

Marketing Lesson: Google+ is an interesting new development in the social media world. We have yet to see how it will impact search results and inbound marketing, but you can keep updated on how marketers can use Google+ by following HubSpot!
Google's Ban of Co.cc Domains

A SIDEBAR! FYI

Google Bans A Domain

On Thursday evening, Google banned the Co.cc domain, which removed every website using that domain from all Google search results. While Google reserves the right to ban all sites on a certain host if a high percentage of sites hosted on that domain are spammy, it's not something they do very often.

Marketing Lesson: As a marketer, Google's co.cc ban is an example of why it's very important to make sure all your content is hosted on domains that you own.

Google's Ebook/Video on Zero Moment of Truth

This week, Google also released an ebook and video explaining the zero moment of truth (ZMOT). ZMOT is a theory about consumer buying practices. It builds on the First Moment of Truth (FMOT), as defined by P&G back in 2005. According to P&G, FMOT is the first moment when a consumer interacts with your product on a store shelf. ZMOT takes the idea one step further. It refers to the time between when a consumer first becomes aware of your product and when they buy it.

Today's consumers begin to build relationships with and make decisions about products before they ever even come in contact with the product. According to Google's report, 70% of Americans say they look at product reviews before making a purchase, and the average shopper references 10.7 sources of information before buying.

Marketing Lesson: Brands need to be practicing inbound marketing to ensure that consumers are have a great zero moment of truth. 


Don't forget to tune into the Marketing Update live next Friday at 4 PM ET!

Read more: http://blog.hubspot.com/blog/tabid/6307/bid/18671/What-Marketers-Should-Know-About-Google-s-Latest-Announcements-HubSpot-TV.aspx#ixzz1RA9TAoL5

Saturday, July 2, 2011

3 mistakes every entrepreneur can learn from

3 mistakes every entrepreneur can learn from
 
Posted: 30 Jun 2011 06:00 AM PDT
(Editor’s note: Chad Little is the founder and CEO of FetchBack. He submitted this story to VentureBeat.)

As entrepreneurs we tend to beat ourselves up over the tiniest mistakes – but sometimes we make big ones. I’ve been part of four ventures over 20 years, but some of the biggest I’ve made came when I launched Sandbox Entertainment. We had millions of customers – but little revenue. I was the founder – but ultimately, I was fired. We had roughly 100 employees – but no team.

The good thing about mistakes is you can learn from them. Here’s what I did wrong.

Mistake #1: Not prioritizing the company culture – At Sandbox, I was so focused on things like fundraising and acquiring customers that culture wasn’t on my priority list.

During the course of building the company we acquired another entity, whose employees had a culture that didn’t match ours (or that of a startup company). Through no fault of their own, they continued working as they always had, which unfortunately didn’t mesh well with our existing way of running things. It’s something I should have paid attention to, but didn’t – and that was a huge screw-up.

By the time I realized there was a problem, the internal culture was completely out of synch. Trying to re-synch the process was so burdensome that it began to take time away from innovating the product and creating a sustainable model.

My takeaway from this was to spend time building a company culture that contributed to the overall success from the very beginning. I also learned to pay attention to the symptoms of a workforce that isn’t working and deal with it swiftly.

Mistake #2: False sense of financial security  – The ability to raise capital and high valuations was completely out of hand in the 90s and we all know how that ended. Like so many dot-coms, we were handed a pile of money that made us feel secure, but it was an illusion.

Because of that influx, we spent cash like it was guaranteed to keep flowing. Because of a ripe market and some really smart viral marketing, we had an amazing growth in our user base early on, but that didn’t mean we had a sustainable revenue plan (something we considered to be a minor detail at the time, thanks to the cash infusion).

I knew that it would take years for the organization to drive big revenue, but we could have easily implemented another model to curb some of the mounting costs, and probably would have made the business cash flow neutral. Here’s the kicker: without a large bank account, we might have been forced to come to that conclusion, or another creative way to keep revenue coming in the door. This effort may have even saved the company. But we didn’t feel the need to go there, since our bank account was padded by VC dollars. Ultimately, we realized we shouldn’t have taken the big round.

Mistake #3: No clear vision – Sandbox had no clear vision – and, at the time, no one realized how problematic this was. Before you talk to an investor – hell, before you talk to your first prospective customer – pull your partners and executive team together and come to terms on this. Take as much time as you need here because this will be what you go back to when things go awry (and they will go awry).

I was rightly fired from the company I had founded and I believe it partly goes back to my failure to take this step. After I was dismissed, Sandbox was merged into another company – and the remaining executives weren’t able to stand their ground on how the company should grow, because they had no ground. Had we built a formal vision and stuck to our guns, things might have turned out quite differently.

        
PRESENTED BY: Executive Leadership, LLC
SPECIALIZING IN: Career Transformation or Change and Executive Coaching or Development - (908) 822-9655 WEBSITE: http://www.exec-leadershipLLC.com

Is your company ready for the second wave of social media?

Is your company ready for the second wave of social media?

By Jesse Stanchak on June 24, 2011 | 

When people ask what the next big thing in social media will be, they’re usually looking for an ascendant platform that will supplant Facebook the way Facebook supplanted MySpace or they’re expecting a feature set, such as geo-location or group messaging. But what if it’s not a network or a tool? What if it’s an application?

“Internal social media is the second wave … the future of work is in communities,” said Cisco’s Andrew Warden at this week’s Corporate Social Media Summit.

Warden gave the crowd four reasons to start looking at internal social tools:

The next wave of employees will expect it. The current workforce has members of every generation who love social tools, as well as those who loathe them. But the next generation of workers will have no such divide, Warden argued. These workers will have grown up with these tools and will expect to use them as part of their internal work communications, because that’s how they’ve always communicated. Failing to have an internal social media system in place would alienate these workers and keep them from fully contributing to the company, Warden said.

The workforce is increasingly global. Global deals, branch offices and telework are going to become more common for companies of every stripe and if you want remote teams to work together and stay engaged with their mission, you need to give them tools to work collaboratively, just as if they were all in the office together, Warden noted. Social tools also make 24-hour operations and complex global deals easier on employees, by allowing work to pass easily between time zones, thus empowering work/life balance without a loss of continuity.

It can make management easier. By watching internal social communications between employees, managers can figure out where their workers are spending the most time, where their pain points are and what resources are needed to enhance performance, Warden noted.

A strong corporate culture may depend on it. The focus of social media so far as been on external branding — communicating your vision and values to your customers. But what about your employees? Do they understand the company’s vision? Do they share it? Feel like they’re a part of it? Live it out everyday in their work? Warden notes that internal branding allows your company strategy to permeate the corporate culture, instead of working against it.

Of course, embracing internal social media will bring me fresh challenges, he notes. The technology is still evolving — Cisco decided to build their own internal tools rather than go with an outside vendor. Training is key, particularly since broad guidelines such as “don’t do anything stupid” can mean radically different things to workers of different generations. And not every department will embrace such tools with the same vigor, possibly creating the need for incentive programs, he noted. All the more reason to get started now — before the next generation of workers shows up.

How are you using social media within your own company?

PRESENTED BY: Executive Leadership, LLC SPECIALIZING IN: Career Transformation or Change and Executive Coaching or Development - (908) 822-9655 WEBSITE: http://www.exec-leadershipLLC.com

Friday, July 1, 2011

ANNOUNCING THE NEW: “Association of Corporate Executive Coaches” and “Association of Executive Coaches” Join now on LinkedIn for free during open enrollment~

 ANNOUNCING THE NEW:

“Association of Corporate Executive Coaches”

and
“Association of Executive Coaches”

Join now on LinkedIn

for free during open enrollment~



======================================================

the “Association of Corporate Executive Coaches”

for Executive Coaches, who specialize in the corporate area

======================================================

See your LinkedIn directory of groups for

"ASSOCIATION OF CORPORATE EXECUTIVE COACHES (ACEC)"

ABOUT ACEC

ACEC is dedicated to serving Executive Coaches who specialize in coaching business leaders in the Corporate, Non-Profit and Professional arena. It is our intent to use our upcoming blog, website, social networks and events so that we can collectively serve as a source for our target audiences.

As we grow, services we plan to provide include certification, client industry updates, coach-to-coach sounding boards, webcast, conferences, face-to-face meetings, technical support, guest speakers, lobbying for client/coach confidentiality, group blogging, marketing support packages, and much more.

ACEC MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS:

1. Masters degree in business, or in a business related field such as:
           Marketing,
           Leadership,
           I/O Psychology,
           Labor Law/Relations, or
           Management etc.
2. Professional experience working in a corporation preferably on the income side, working in a non-profit on the executive administrative side or as a profitable entrepreneur in a business preferably other than coaching.
3. Evidence of a minimum of 4 corporate clients/key contributors where coaching was focused on organizational performance or development.
4. A recommendation from 2 clients (recommendations on your LinkedIn profile may be used)
5. Submission of your coaching methodology.


Please email this information to: cb@exec-leadershipllc.com; or feel free to contact CB Bowman @ 908 822-9655 from 11am to 6 pm est./USA

ACEC MEMBER PROMOTION

Self-promotion is welcomed in the promotion section. It is here that we recommend that you place your bio and your coaching methodology so that potential clients can learn about your experience. Your fee structure may also be included.

ACEC FEES

Membership is currently free during open enrollment.

Certification by ACEC is currently not required to join. In 2012/ 2014 our goal will be to require certification. Current members in good standing will be grandfathered.

======================================================

ANNOUNCING:

the “Association of Executive Coaches"

AEC is dedicated to Executive and Career Coaches

who serve the general public.

======================================================

See your LinkedIn directory of groups for

"ASSOCIATION OF EXECUTIVE COACHES (AEC)"

ABOUT AEC

It is our intent to use LinkedIn and the upcoming blog, website, and events to serve as a source for our target audiences.

As we grow services we plan to provide include coach-to-coach sounding boards, webcast, conferences, face-to-face meetings, guest speakers, lobbying for client/coach confidentiality, group blogging, and much more.

AEC MEMBERSHIP REQUIREMENTS

Certification in coaching from an accredited institute or evidence of experience
Certification in two coaching assessment instruments i.e. MBTI, 360 etc.
A recommendation from 2 clients (recommendations on your LinkedIn profile may be used)
Submission of your coaching methodology


AEC FEES

Membership is currently free during open enrollment. Certification by AEC is currently not required to join.

Please email information to: cb@exec-leadershipllc.com; or feel free to contact CB Bowman @ 908 822-9655 from 11am to 6 pm est./USA

Website currently under construction

www.acec-website.org